|
New York City Weather
|
|
|
How does rain affect fresh concrete?
A contractor placed a concrete driveway for me last night. Before
they could start the finishing work, it rained for several minutes.
We covered everything we could but the concrete still got quite
wet. In the end, they were able to finish (floating and edging),
but I am really concerned how this will hold up long term.
A:Rainfall during placement of concrete
flatwork can present challenges to achieving a quality concrete.
Potential outcomes range from no damage to a weakened nondurable
surface. Only time will tell at which end of the range your specific
situation will fall. Descriptions of a best case scenario and a
worst case scenario follow:
Best
case: The concrete is protected as much as possible from
the falling rain. After the rain has stopped, the water that has
fallen on the surface is allowed to evaporate just as bleed water
from the original concrete mixture must be allowed to evaporate
prior to proceeding with finishing operations. To substantially
change the water-cement ratio (w/c) of the concrete at the surface
of the slab, energy must be added to the system, typically in the
form of troweling passes with excess water on the concrete surface.
If the water is allowed to evaporate, the w/c remains reasonably
low, and since w/c governs the strength of the concrete there is
no substantial damage to the finished surface. In extreme cases
it is not uncommon to physically remove excess water from the slab
surface by dragging a garden hose or a broom across the concrete
surface to lower the volume of water that must evaporate. With proper
timing and process, the durability of the concrete is not affected.
Worst
case: The concrete is not protected from the rain; the
water is not allowed to evaporate from the slab surface; and multiple
passes of the floats and trowels used to finish the surface are
made with the surface moisture in place. The energy supplied by
the finishing operations mixes the excess water into the slab surface
creating a high w/c ratio in the near surface of the concrete reducing
its strength and thus its durability. In the worst situation, the
damage to the concrete surface is readily apparent since the texture
of the surface is easily damaged or removed after the initial curing
period. (If the surface is dusty after 14 days of curing there a
likely to be a problem.) If the surface strength is only slightly
affected, the long term durability of the concrete may be reduced
as evidenced by a general loss of the surface mortar (scaling) after
the concrete has been through a winter season of freezing and thawing
cycles; however, the concrete strength and durability below the
surface would not be affected.
In most cases concrete is warranted for one year, which will allow
you to assess the potential durability of the concrete surface,
and in instances similar to this one many contractors are willing
to extend the warranty for an additional period of time (an extra
year or two) to settle the doubt.
Is there an admixture that prevents scaling?
While there are a number of chemical admixtures and supplementary cementitious materials that can improve the quality of concrete, there is no substitute for quality concrete when the issue is spalling or scaling. The most important factors in achieving durable exterior concrete surfaces are appropriate cement content, air-entraining admixture (to produce the proper air content for the aggregate size), and proper placement, consolidation, finishing and curing.
What effects do deicers have on concrete?
Sodium chloride:
Sodium chloride has little or no effect on properly air entrained
concrete but will damage plants and corrode metal.
Calcium chloride: Calcium chloride in weak solutions
has little chemical effect on concrete or vegetation but does corrode
metal, and strong calcium chloride solutions can chemically attack
concrete. The reaction is accelerated by high temperature
Magnesium chloride:
A PCA literature search found three references comparing the effects
of magnesium chloride with sodium chloride and other deicers on
the scaling resistance of concrete. Unfortunately, the cited studies
provide conflicting results.
The abstract from a German field study (Leiser 1967) states that
"concrete surfaces were only slightly affected [by magnesium
chloride lye], and that the solution is less harmful than granulated
salt." However, two recent studies found magnesium chloride
to be more aggressive than sodium chloride.
In the first study (Cody 1996), concrete containing dolomite coarse
aggregate was cored from five highway pavements. Small blocks were
cut from the cores and subjected to wet-dry and freeze-thaw cycles
in 0.75M and 3.0M solutions of NaCl, CaCl2, and MgCl2. Magnesium
chloride was the most destructive deicer, producing severe deterioration
under almost all of the experimental conditions. Calcium chloride
was the next most destructive salt. Sodium chloride was relatively
benign. In the second study (Lee 2000),
the researchers again found magnesium chloride to be significantly
more aggressive than sodium chloride in wet-dry and freeze-thaw
conditions.
In both of these studies, the
authors concluded that the major cause of deterioration by magnesium-based
deicers was the formation of non-cohesive magnesium silicate hydrates
(MSH), produced by the reaction of dissolved magnesium with calcium
silicate hydrates of the cement. Because MSH does not form strong
bonds with aggregate particles, these phases cause loss of cohesion
in portland cement paste and will promote crumbling. A common finding
of the above research is that all deicers can aggravate scaling,
emphasizing the need for placing high-quality, air-entrained concrete
in deicer environments.
Urea does not chemically damage
concrete, vegetation or metal.
Ammonium: Deicers containing ammonium
nitrate and ammonium sulfate should be prohibited because they rapidly
attack and disintegrate concrete. Deicers used in low concentrations
(2% to 4% by weight) can cause more surface scaling than higher
concentrations or no deicer at all.
What causes efflorescence and how can it be avoided?
Efflorescence is a type of
discoloration. It is a deposit, usually white in color that occasionally
develops on the surface of concrete, often just after a structure
is completed. Although unattractive, efflorescence is usually harmless.
In rare cases excessive efflorescence, within the pores of the material,
can cause expansion that may disrupt the surface.
Efflorescence is caused by a combination of circumstances:
soluble salts in the material, moisture to dissolve the salts, and
vapor transmission or hydrostatic pressure that moves the solution
toward the surface. Water in moist, hardened concrete dissolves
soluble salts. This salt-water solution migrates to the surface
by vapor transmission or hydraulic pressure where the water evaporates,
leaving the salt deposit at the surface. Particularly temperature,
humidity and wind affect efflorescence. In the summer, even after
long periods of rain, moisture evaporates so quickly that comparatively
small amounts of salt are brought to the surface.
Moisture testing to determine the vapor pressure
at the slab surface will tell you how much moisture is moving through
the slab. A common value of vapor pressure acceptable for moisture
sensitive floor coverings is 3 to 5 lb./1000
sq.ft./24 hours. The Calcium Chloride Vapor Pressure Test is commonly
used. Testing of the soils and concrete would identify the source
of the soluble salts. and a look at the
drainage, irrigation systems, accommodation of the building runoff
(downspout drops etc.), and ground waters may give some valuable
clues as to the source of moisture that is driving this process
These types of problems can be very complex to resolve.
One possible strategy would be to install a French drain system
which over time will lower the moisture content of the soil under
the slab. With lower moisture content under the slab, the transmission
of water through the slab will slow or nearly cease. Without the
moisture the salts are no longer transported to the slab surface
and the process should stop. Avoid adding additional water to the
system. In general any wet process cleanup converts the buildup
to a solution which is re-deposited onto the concrete surface to
reappear when the concrete dries. In many cases the use of a dry
method cleanup will help to reduce or prevent a re-occurrence of
efflorescence
What is ettringite and does it or the sulfate in cement contribute to expansion and disintegration of portland cement concrete?
Ettringite,
calcium sulfoaluminate, is found in all portland cement concretes
and is commonly referenced in petrographic reports. Calcium sulfate
sources, such as gypsum, are added to portland cement to prevent
rapid setting and improve strength development. Sulfate is also
present in supplementary cementitious materials and admixtures.
Gypsum and other sulfate compounds react with calcium aluminate
in the cement to form ettringite within the first few hours after
mixing with water. Essentially all of the sulfur in the cement is
normally consumed to form ettringite within 24 hours.
The formation of ettringite results in a volume increase in the
fresh, plastic concrete. Due to the concrete’s plastic condition,
this expansion is harmless and unnoticed. If concrete is exposed
to water for long periods of time (many years), the ettringite can
slowly dissolve and reform in less confined locations. Upon microscopic
examination, harmless white needle-like crystals of ettringite can
be observed lining air voids. 
Any form of attack or disintegration of concrete by freeze-thaw
action, alkali-silica reactivity (ASR), or other means, accelerates
the rate at which ettringite leaves its original location in the
paste to go into solution and recrystallizes in larger spaces such
as voids or cracks. Both water and space must be present for the
crystals to form. The space is often provided by cracks that form
due to damage caused by frost action, ASR, drying shrinkage, or
other mechanisms. Ettringite crystals in air voids and cracks are
typically two to four micrometers in cross section and 20 to 30
micrometers long. Under conditions of extreme deterioration, the
white ettringite crystals appear to completely fill voids or cracks.
However, ettringite, found in its preferred state as large needle-like
crystals, should not be interpreted as causing the expansion of
deteriorating concrete.
Another term used in petrographic reports is Delayed Ettringite
Formation (DEF). This refers to a condition usually associated
with heat-treated concrete. Certain concretes of particular chemical
makeup which have been exposed to temperatures over about 70°C
(158°F) during curing can undergo expansion and cracking caused
by later ettringite formation. This can occur because the high temperature
decomposes any initial ettringite formed and holds the sulfate and
alumina tightly in the calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) gel of the
cement paste. The normal formation of ettringite is thus impeded.
In
the presence of moisture, sulfate and alumina desorb from the confines
of the C-S-H to form ettringite in cooled and hardened concrete.
After months or years of desorption, ettringite forms in confined
locations within the paste. Since the concrete is rigid and if there
are insufficient voids to accommodate the ettringite volume increase,
expansion and cracks can occur. In addition, some of the initial
ettringite formed before heating may be converted to monosulfoaluminate
at high temperatures and upon cooling, revert back to ettringite.
Because ettringite takes up more space than monosulfoaluminate from
which it forms, the transformation is an expansive reaction.
Only extreme cases of DEF result in cracking, and often DEF is
associated with other deterioration mechanisms. Air voids can help
relieve the stress by providing a location for the delayed ettringite
to form. Finally, some petrographers or concrete technologists use
the term “secondary ettringite” to refer to both DEF
and harmless ettringite found lining voids (often listed under secondary
deposits in petrographic reports).
Can water cause deterioration of concrete?
Generally, the combination of water
and favorable temperatures increases the strength of concrete throughout
its life cycle. However, water also can act as the transport system
for nearly all mechanisms aggressive to concrete. Some examples
are:
- Porous, water-saturated concrete that does not have adequate
strength and entrained air is prone to scaling, which is a deterioration
mechanism caused by freezing of water in concrete
- Water can carry aggressive chemicals into the concrete surface
such as acids, sulfates, or chlorides
- Concrete that contains alkali-reactive aggregates is subject
to deleterious expansion from water
- Water that passes over the surface of concrete with a high velocity
can erode the surface over time
Exposure to water is typically beneficial to concrete, but there
are circumstances in which it can also contribute to the deterioration
of concrete. Service environme
How do you diagnose damage from alkali-silica reaction (ASR) in a concrete structure?
The diagnosis of alkali-silica reaction (ASR) in a concrete structure
requires a combination of recognition of the visual symptoms of ASR,
appropriate testing to verify the presence of ASR gel, and deterioration
of the concrete in the structure. Typical visual symptoms include
unusual expansion of the concrete evidenced by longitudinal cracks,
map cracking (random cracking pattern), closed joints, spalled surfaces,
displacement of adjacent structural components, popouts, efflorescence,
or discoloration (darkened or blotchy areas). If site inspections
reveal one or more of these visual symptoms it may be appropriate
to sample and test the concrete to verify the presence of ASR gel.
In addition, the source of any other deterioration mechanisms should
be noted and the structure should be evaluated for soundness. Appropriate
testing can be performed using one of the following methods:
- Petrographic Analysis (ASTM C 856 or AASHTO T 299)
- Uranyl-Acetate Treatment (discussed in the Annex to ASTM C 856
or AASHTO T 299)
- Los Alamos Staining Method (Powers 1999)
Can lightweight concrete be used for bridge construction?
Lightweight concrete can be and has been used for bridge construction for decades. There are many examples of lightweight concrete bridge construction in different environments:
- Upper deck of the Oakland Bay Bridge constructed in 1936 (still in service)
- William Preston Lane, Jr. Bridge, Chesapeake Bay, Maryland, constructed in 1952 (still in service)
Of course any concrete mixture considered for a specific application should always be evaluated for the service environment in which it will be placed. Concrete used in bridge construction in severe weathering regions typically requires low permeability to provide protection for the steel reinforcement in the structure as the use of deicing chemicals increases the risk of corrosion of any steel reinforcement. Corrosion of the steel is a primary concern for the long term durability of this type of structure. Low permeability and high strength are closely related concrete properties; as strength increases permeability decreases.
Concrete strengths used in bridges typically equal or exceed 5000 psi and some bridge specifications require permeability testing using the “Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration," ASTM C1202. These minimum precautions should be implemented regardless of the type of concrete being considered.
In summary lightweight concrete that has been properly tested to assure that it provides the required properties for the specific structure in question can be used for bridge construction.
|
|